Ill-Communication free essay sample

An examination of the nature of the Anglo-American relations in the opening of the Civil War. This paper illustrates the problems of diplomacy in the Civil War era. The author highlights the relationship between British and American diplomats during the American Civil War and describes how tensions between them almost plunged them into a disastrous conflict. The two great nations of Great Britain and the United States nearly came to blows during the American Civil War but more out of misunderstanding than justified animosity. This is a fact that is all too apparent when one examines the path that the diplomacy of the Civil War took. The confusing and inefficient nature of international relations during the Civil War era nearly precipitated a third Anglo-American conflict in less than a hundred years. Only calculated decisions, quick witted diplomacy and the urges of sensible men like Charles Francis Adams and Benjamin Disraeli were able to deliver these two giants from pummeling one another. We will write a custom essay sample on Ill-Communication or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page

Ozymandias Analysis Essays

Ozymandias Analysis Essays Ozymandias Analysis Paper Ozymandias Analysis Paper The overall meaning of Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poem â€Å"Ozymandias† is that no one lasts forever; eventually even the greatest men die and are forgotten. Nature eventually conquers the tallest and most prosperous cities, leaving them colossal wrecks. The statue of Ozymandias, also known as the Egyptian Ruler Ramses II, was erected in Ramses’ own likeness in his honor, among other monuments. So, even though Ramses II was so powerful and recognized, he eventually became forgotten and abandoned. In Greek, Ozymandias can be broken down into two words: ozy and myndias. Ozy means air and myndias means king. Essentially, Ramses was the King of the Air, which can mean the King of Nothing, which shows his power is temporary. I think the author wants to show the fact that something that was once so powerful and looked upon, such as the King of Kings was, after a while, destroyed. Now, some statue, that he had had done for himself because he thought he was so superior, is destroyed, barely remembered and mocked. The voice of â€Å"Ozymandias† is said through what sounds most like the author, Percy Bysshe Shelley, since the first line says, â€Å"I met a traveler from an antique land.. The poem is written in whole sentences, but they are chopped up between lines using caesurae, which makes them slightly choppy but with a smooth overlay. The tone, to me, sounds slightly depressing and solemn, but that is understandable, since the poem is talking about how nothing lasts forever. Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote this poem in competition with his friend Horace Smith. Both poems have the same su bject, tell the same story, and make the same moral points. They also both had the same title for a while, but then Smith retitled his poem to another name.